8
$\begingroup$

Should we have p3d.in embedding? It could be handy for or questions.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Is it possible here? $\endgroup$ – iKlsR Jun 2 '13 at 18:58
  • $\begingroup$ could come in handy, but then those discussions become dependant on p3d. At the same time we want to avoid using video as answer, how is that different? $\endgroup$ – zeffii Jun 2 '13 at 21:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ As one of the p3d.in developers I can say that we certainly wouldn't mind embeds being used here :) $\endgroup$ – jesterKing Jun 5 '13 at 4:52
  • $\begingroup$ @iKlsR well Math.SE and mathoverflow have MathJaX which is considered a "very heavy dependency" by Atwood; as far as I know p3d.in is fairly light. As a developer it doesn't strike me as being too difficult to implement (although it's easy for me to say...) $\endgroup$ – wchargin Jun 9 '13 at 21:16
  • $\begingroup$ Indeed. It should be enough to implement a tag that takes a shortid. Upon rendering of the tag it would be replaced by an iframe. $\endgroup$ – jesterKing Jun 16 '13 at 7:28
5
$\begingroup$

I can see how it could be useful, but in general I would have to say no, we should not enable it.

I feel that having this tool could potentially encourage more tutorial-style answers, which we should generally try to discourage. Most questions and answers on this site should be simple enough to be answered with text and screenshots.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Good point. We don't want tutorial-style answers. $\endgroup$ – Daniel says Reinstate Monica Jun 3 '13 at 13:13
  • $\begingroup$ I agree we shouldn't allow 3D embedding. I can't imagine many scenarios where an embedded 3d model helps illustrate a point. $\endgroup$ – Mike Pan Jun 4 '13 at 19:51
  • $\begingroup$ Same here, it's bad enough we should even accept .blends at times. This is not a forum per say, answers should be concise and compact. I can only imagine this would clutter the site and encourage showcasing. $\endgroup$ – iKlsR Jun 9 '13 at 0:08
4
$\begingroup$

I think we should, because we already need screenshots to answer many of the questions. Why not have screenshots in 3D? Also, it will end up saving space where multiple screenshots are required.

If tutorial requests are too prevalent, maybe just enable p3D in the answers? That would allow people to answer questions (specifically topology questions) with a 3D model.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I agree it would be helpful to have it available for answers sometime. I don't see how it would result in "tutorial style" answers, since you can't animate P3D embeds or anything. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Williamson Jun 5 '13 at 15:22
  • $\begingroup$ That might work! $\endgroup$ – Daniel says Reinstate Monica Jun 10 '13 at 13:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .