Timeline for What should our custom off-topic close reasons be?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://blender.stackexchange.com/ with https://blender.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Mar 16, 2017 at 15:51 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.blender.stackexchange.com/ with https://blender.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 14, 2015 at 22:15 | history | edited | iKlsRMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
| Apr 3, 2014 at 22:45 | answer | added | Thom Blair III | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 18, 2014 at 0:03 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
|
|
| Jan 3, 2014 at 15:06 | comment | added | iKlsR Mod | @DantheMan We can ask for more. SO has like a dozen or so. | |
| Jan 3, 2014 at 14:51 | comment | added | Daniel Mod | @iKlsR I thought there was a limit to how many off-topic reasons of 3. | |
| Dec 17, 2013 at 23:10 | answer | added | Keavon | timeline score: -1 | |
| Dec 15, 2013 at 20:18 | comment | added | iKlsR Mod | @DantheMan We want specific close reasons. Doesn't make sense to close then have to further explain why. | |
| Dec 15, 2013 at 19:21 | comment | added | Daniel Mod | We should use all top three. Feature requests off-topic reason doesn't seem that necessary. | |
| Dec 13, 2013 at 11:36 | answer | added | gandalf3 | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 13, 2013 at 10:56 | history | edited | iKlsRMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 13, 2013 at 10:05 | answer | added | gandalf3 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 13, 2013 at 9:52 | comment | added | gandalf3 | The bug report one needs to be updated, that link goes to a 404 now that blender.org has been updated. | |
| Dec 13, 2013 at 9:51 | answer | added | gandalf3 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 3, 2013 at 17:17 | answer | added | Matt | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 3, 2013 at 16:55 | comment | added | iKlsR Mod | @Matt I agree, hence the point of this post. Feel free to suggest some below. | |
| Dec 3, 2013 at 16:52 | comment | added | Matt | We should also have a close reason to handle tutorial requests. This might normally be covered by the standard "no effort" StackExchange reason, but I think the nature of this site deserves a reason that's more clear and less frustrating to people who might not understand how their question "shows no effort." | |
| Nov 16, 2013 at 22:27 | history | edited | iKlsRMod |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 16, 2013 at 1:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackBlender/status/401515682040270848 | ||
| Nov 15, 2013 at 13:10 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by iKlsRMod | ||
| Nov 15, 2013 at 13:10 | history | edited | iKlsRMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 60 characters in body
|
| Nov 15, 2013 at 13:02 | history | asked | iKlsRMod | CC BY-SA 3.0 |